🧪 Skills

Cord Trees

Dynamic task tree orchestration inspired by Cord protocol. Agent builds its own coordination tree at runtime — deciding decomposition, parallelism, and depen...

v1.0.1
❤️ 2
⬇️ 193
👁 2
Share

Description


name: cord-trees description: | Dynamic task tree orchestration inspired by Cord protocol. Agent builds its own coordination tree at runtime — deciding decomposition, parallelism, and dependencies dynamically. Implements spawn (isolated context) vs fork (inherited context) as first-class primitives, plus ask (human elicitation) and serial (ordered sequences).

Use when: complex goals that need dynamic decomposition, tasks where the agent should decide how to break down work, multi-agent coordination with runtime flexibility, human-in-the-loop checkpoints.

Triggers: "figure out how to do X", "decompose this task", "build a task tree for", "dynamic orchestration", "cord-style", "self-organizing agents" version: 1.0.0 license: MIT metadata: openclaw: requires: tools: ["sessions_spawn", "subagents", "read", "write"]

Cord Trees — Dynamic Task Tree Orchestration

Build coordination trees at runtime. You decide the decomposition, not the developer.

Inspired by Cord by June Kim.

Core Concept

Instead of following a pre-defined workflow, you analyze the goal and build your own task tree:

Goal: "Evaluate whether to migrate from REST to GraphQL"

You decide:
├── #1 spawn: Audit current REST API surface
├── #2 spawn: Research GraphQL trade-offs  
├── #3 ask: How many concurrent users? (blocked-by: #1)
├── #4 fork: Comparative analysis (blocked-by: #2, #3)
└── #5 fork: Write recommendation (blocked-by: #4)

The tree emerges from your analysis, not from hardcoded logic.

Five Primitives

1. SPAWN — Isolated Context

Child gets only its task prompt. Clean slate.

spawn(
    goal="Research GraphQL adoption patterns",
    prompt="Search for case studies of REST→GraphQL migrations...",
    blocked_by=[]  # Can start immediately
)

Use when: Task is self-contained, doesn't need sibling context.

2. FORK — Inherited Context

Child receives all completed sibling results injected into prompt.

fork(
    goal="Synthesize findings into recommendation",
    prompt="Based on the research, write a recommendation...",
    blocked_by=["research-rest", "research-graphql", "user-scale"]
)

Use when: Synthesis, analysis, or integration requiring prior work.

3. ASK — Human Elicitation

Pause for human input. Creates a checkpoint.

ask(
    question="How many concurrent users do you serve?",
    options=["<1K", "1K-10K", "10K-100K", ">100K"],
    blocked_by=["audit-api"]  # Ask after audit provides context
)

Use when: Decision requires human knowledge or approval.

4. SERIAL — Ordered Sequence

Children execute in order. Implicit dependencies.

serial([
    {"goal": "Draft report", "type": "spawn"},
    {"goal": "Review draft", "type": "ask"},
    {"goal": "Finalize report", "type": "fork"}
])

Use when: Strict ordering required.

5. GOAL — Root Node

The top-level objective. You decompose it into children.

Implementation with OpenClaw

Map Cord primitives to OpenClaw tools:

Cord Primitive OpenClaw Implementation
spawn sessions_spawn(task=prompt, label=id)
fork sessions_spawn with sibling results in task
ask Message human, wait for response
serial Spawn sequentially, wait between each
read_tree Read state file + subagents list
complete Write result to state file

State File

Track the tree in cord-state.json:

{
  "goal": "Evaluate REST to GraphQL migration",
  "nodes": {
    "#1": {
      "type": "spawn",
      "goal": "Audit REST API",
      "status": "complete",
      "result": "47 endpoints, 12 nested...",
      "blockedBy": [],
      "sessionKey": "abc123"
    },
    "#2": {
      "type": "spawn",
      "goal": "Research GraphQL",
      "status": "running",
      "blockedBy": [],
      "sessionKey": "def456"
    },
    "#3": {
      "type": "ask",
      "goal": "Get user scale",
      "status": "waiting",
      "question": "How many concurrent users?",
      "options": ["<1K", "1K-10K", "10K-100K", ">100K"],
      "blockedBy": ["#1"]
    },
    "#4": {
      "type": "fork",
      "goal": "Comparative analysis",
      "status": "blocked",
      "blockedBy": ["#2", "#3"]
    }
  },
  "nextId": 5
}

Workflow

Phase 1: Analyze Goal

Read the goal. Think about:

  • What are the major components?
  • What can run in parallel?
  • What has dependencies?
  • Where do I need human input?
  • What needs synthesis (fork) vs isolation (spawn)?

Phase 2: Build Initial Tree

Create nodes for the first level of decomposition:

# Initialize state
state = {
    "goal": user_goal,
    "nodes": {},
    "nextId": 1
}

# Add initial nodes
add_node(state, type="spawn", goal="Research A", blockedBy=[])
add_node(state, type="spawn", goal="Research B", blockedBy=[])
add_node(state, type="fork", goal="Synthesize", blockedBy=["#1", "#2"])

write("cord-state.json", state)

Phase 3: Execute Ready Nodes

Find nodes that are ready (all blockedBy complete):

def get_ready_nodes(state):
    ready = []
    for id, node in state["nodes"].items():
        if node["status"] != "blocked":
            continue
        deps = node["blockedBy"]
        if all(state["nodes"][d]["status"] == "complete" for d in deps):
            ready.append(id)
    return ready

For each ready node:

If spawn:

sessions_spawn(
    task=node["prompt"],
    label=node_id,
    runTimeoutSeconds=600
)
node["status"] = "running"

If fork:

# Inject sibling results
sibling_context = collect_sibling_results(state, node)
full_prompt = f"{node['prompt']}\n\nContext from prior work:\n{sibling_context}"

sessions_spawn(task=full_prompt, label=node_id)
node["status"] = "running"

If ask:

# Message human
message(action="send", message=f"Question: {node['question']}\nOptions: {node['options']}")
node["status"] = "waiting"
# Wait for response, then mark complete with answer

Phase 4: Monitor & Update

Poll running agents, update state on completion:

while has_running_or_blocked(state):
    # Check agent status
    agents = subagents(action="list")
    
    for agent in agents:
        node = find_node_by_session(state, agent["sessionKey"])
        if agent["status"] == "complete":
            # Get result from session history
            result = get_agent_result(agent)
            node["status"] = "complete"
            node["result"] = result
    
    # Dispatch newly ready nodes
    for node_id in get_ready_nodes(state):
        dispatch_node(state, node_id)
    
    save_state(state)
    wait(30)  # Don't poll too aggressively

Phase 5: Synthesize

When all nodes complete, the final fork node produces the result.

Dynamic Restructuring

Agents can modify their own subtree at runtime:

# Child agent realizes it needs more research
add_child_node(
    parent="#2",
    type="spawn",
    goal="Deep dive on performance implications",
    blockedBy=[]
)

This is what makes Cord-style orchestration powerful — the tree evolves based on what agents discover.

Spawn vs Fork Decision Guide

Situation Use
Independent research task spawn
Task that doesn't need sibling context spawn
Cheap to restart if it fails spawn
Synthesis or analysis across prior work fork
Final integration step fork
Task that builds on discoveries fork

Default to spawn. Use fork only when context inheritance is required.

Human-in-the-Loop Patterns

Approval Gate

#1 spawn: Draft proposal
#2 ask: "Approve this proposal?" (blocked-by: #1)
#3 fork: Implement approved proposal (blocked-by: #2)

Clarification

#1 spawn: Initial analysis
#2 ask: "Which direction should we focus?" (blocked-by: #1)
#3 spawn: Deep dive on chosen direction (blocked-by: #2)

Periodic Checkpoints

#1 spawn: Phase 1
#2 ask: "Continue to phase 2?" (blocked-by: #1)
#3 spawn: Phase 2 (blocked-by: #2)
#4 ask: "Continue to phase 3?" (blocked-by: #3)
...

Example: Full Decomposition

Goal: "Create a comprehensive competitor analysis report"

#1 [spawn] List top 5 competitors
    └── No dependencies, starts immediately

#2 [spawn] Research Competitor A (blocked-by: #1)
#3 [spawn] Research Competitor B (blocked-by: #1)
#4 [spawn] Research Competitor C (blocked-by: #1)
#5 [spawn] Research Competitor D (blocked-by: #1)
#6 [spawn] Research Competitor E (blocked-by: #1)
    └── All parallel, isolated research

#7 [fork] Identify patterns across competitors (blocked-by: #2-#6)
    └── Needs all research results

#8 [ask] "Focus on pricing, features, or positioning?" (blocked-by: #7)
    └── Human steers direction

#9 [fork] Deep analysis on chosen focus (blocked-by: #8)
    └── Builds on patterns + human input

#10 [fork] Write final report (blocked-by: #9)
    └── Synthesis of everything

Error Handling

if node["status"] == "failed":
    # Options:
    # 1. Retry (reset to blocked)
    node["status"] = "blocked"
    node["retries"] = node.get("retries", 0) + 1
    
    # 2. Skip (mark complete with error)
    node["status"] = "complete"
    node["result"] = f"FAILED: {error}"
    
    # 3. Escalate (ask human)
    add_node(state, type="ask", 
             question=f"Node {id} failed. Retry, skip, or abort?",
             blockedBy=[])

Attribution

This skill implements patterns from the Cord protocol by June Kim, adapted for OpenClaw's sessions_spawn and subagents primitives.

Reviews (0)

Sign in to write a review.

No reviews yet. Be the first to review!

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!

Compatible Platforms

Pricing

Free

Related Configs