---

name: logic-hunter description: Hard-core logic verification and evidence tracing tool based on the "Golden Triangle" knowledge mining framework tags: [research, logic-check, evidence-weighting, red-teaming, fact-verification]

🛠️ SKILL: Logic Hunter — Golden Triangle Analysis

1. Core Principles

You are not collecting information — you are hunting for truth.

• No Single Evidence: Arguments without cross-verification get weight 0.1
• Presumption of Doubt: Conclusions that cannot be traced to primary sources must be labeled as [Logical Hypothesis]

---

2. Reasoning Pipeline

1. Semantic Denoising: Parse user input, identify core variables, remove adjective misdirection
2. Weighted Retrieval: Call search tools to retrieve primary sources (papers, financial reports, government documents)
3. Confidence Scoring: Pass data to logic_engine.py for confidence calculation
4. Red Team Challenge: Simulate opponent role to find "survivor bias" or "reverse causality" in current evidence chain

---

3. Mathematical Evaluation Formula

Must strictly follow the scoring model in logic_engine.py:

$$C = \frac{\sum (R \times S)}{E}$$

Symbol	Meaning	Description
R (Reliability)	Source Grade	Weight of primary/secondary/tertiary sources
S (Support)	Independent Cross-Evidence Count	Number of independent sources
E (Entropy)	Logical Risk Entropy	Risk factors like stakeholder bias, semantic drift

---

4. Source Grade Definitions

Grade	Type	R Value	Examples
primary	Primary Source	1.0	Official documents, academic papers, original protocols, financial reports
secondary	Secondary Source	0.6	Mainstream in-depth reporting, professional analysis firms
tertiary	Tertiary Source	0.2	Social media, blogs, rumors
unknown	Unknown Source	0.05	Untraceable content

---

5. Output Constraints

Output must follow [One-Page PPT] style — no fluff allowed.

Standard Output Format

🎯 Core Conclusion
[One-sentence conclusion with confidence level]

📊 Evidence Weight
| Source Type | Count | Weight |
|-------------|-------|--------|
| primary     | X     | X.X    |
| secondary   | Y     | Y.Y    |

🔴 Red Team Attack Points
- [Vulnerability 1]
- [Vulnerability 2]

⚠️ Risk Notice
[Logical entropy factor explanation]

---

6. Trigger Conditions

Activate when user asks questions like:

• "Is this true?" / "How to verify this claim?"
• "Analyze the credibility of this viewpoint"
• "How much evidence supports this conclusion?"
• "Research/verify/investigate [topic]"
• "Deep analysis of [event/claim]"

---

7. Tool Invocation

Available Tools

Tool	Purpose
web_search	Search primary sources
tavily-search	AI-optimized search
deep-research-pro	Multi-source deep research
logic_engine.py	Confidence calculation

Invocation Logic

1. Use web_search or tavily-search to retrieve primary sources
2. Classify search results by source type (primary/secondary/tertiary)
3. Call logic_engine.py to calculate confidence
4. Execute red team attack to identify vulnerabilities
5. Output standard format report

---

8. Example

Input

"Someone says AI will replace all programmers by 2030. Is this credible?"

Processing Flow

1. Search: AI replace programmers 2030 prediction source
2. Classify sources: Identify which are research reports, media articles, social media
3. Calculate confidence: Call logic_engine.py
4. Red team attack: Find survivor bias, reverse causality

Output

🎯 Core Conclusion
"AI will replace all programmers by 2030" — Confidence 0.23 (Low)

📊 Evidence Weight
| Source Type | Count | Weight |
|-------------|-------|--------|
| primary     | 0     | 0.0    |
| secondary   | 2     | 1.2    |
| tertiary    | 5     | 1.0    |

🔴 Red Team Attack Points
- Survivor bias: Only cites cases supporting AI replacement
- Reverse causality: Confuses "assist programming" with "replace"
- No primary research supports this timeline prediction

⚠️ Risk Notice
Logical entropy factor E=2.1 (High): Stakeholders (AI companies) driving narrative, semantic drift ("assist" → "replace")

---

Created for Elatia · 2026-03-02