Open Source
Find, evaluate, self-host, maintain, and publish open source projects with due diligence scoring, contributor workflows, and release governance.
Description
name: Open Source slug: open-source version: 1.0.0 homepage: https://clawic.com/skills/open-source description: Find, evaluate, self-host, maintain, and publish open source projects with due diligence scoring, contributor workflows, and release governance. changelog: "Initial release with discovery scoring, self-host screening, maintainer operations, and publication workflows." metadata: {"clawdbot":{"emoji":"🌍","requires":{"bins":[]},"os":["linux","darwin","win32"],"configPaths":["~/open-source/"]}}
Setup
On first use, read setup.md silently and start helping immediately. This skill is useful from minute zero with no mandatory onboarding.
When to Use
User needs anything around open source: finding projects, evaluating alternatives, self-hosting, contributing, maintaining, or publishing their own project. Use it when the user asks for practical decisions, not generic theory.
Architecture
Working context lives in ~/open-source/. Keep lightweight state and reusable notes there.
~/open-source/
├── memory.md # Current goals, stack, constraints, decisions
├── discovery-log.md # Evaluated projects and scoring
├── roadmap.md # Near-term maintenance and release plan
└── publishing-checklist.md # Release and distribution checkpoints
Quick Reference
| Topic | File |
|---|---|
| Setup behavior and integration | setup.md |
| Memory structure and status model | memory-template.md |
| Discovery and ranking framework | discovery-framework.md |
| Self-host evaluation matrix | self-host-screen.md |
| Maintainer operations cadence | maintainer-ops.md |
| Publication and launch workflow | publishing-playbook.md |
Core Rules
1. Build an Intent Map Before Recommending
- Start from user context: use case, stack, budget, team size, risk tolerance, and time horizon.
- If key constraints are missing, ask the minimum clarifier needed to avoid bad recommendations.
- Default output shape: shortlist, trade-offs, recommended next action.
2. Score Projects with Verifiable Signals
- Use
discovery-framework.mdto score each candidate on maintenance health, adoption, security posture, extensibility, and operational burden. - Prefer projects with active maintainers, documented release cadence, and issue response discipline.
- Flag uncertainty explicitly when data is incomplete.
3. Separate Use Paths: Consume, Contribute, or Fork
- For consumption, optimize for reliability and migration safety.
- For contribution, optimize for governance quality and contributor experience.
- For fork decisions, require a clear business or architectural reason plus maintenance capacity.
4. Treat Self-Host as an Operations Commitment
- Run
self-host-screen.mdbefore proposing self-host by default. - Require explicit discussion of backups, upgrades, observability, and incident ownership.
- If operational ownership is weak, recommend managed alternatives or phased rollout.
5. Run Maintainer Work in a Predictable Cadence
- Use
maintainer-ops.mdto structure triage, review, release, and deprecation work. - Keep changelogs user-facing and avoid internal ranking language.
- Prefer small frequent releases over irregular large drops.
6. Publish with a Release Contract
- Use
publishing-playbook.mdfor licensing, docs, versioning, distribution, and announcement readiness. - Never publish without clear install path, compatibility notes, and rollback strategy.
- Announce what changed, who is affected, and how to upgrade safely.
7. Preserve Trust and Legal Hygiene
- Do not invent license interpretations. If licensing is unclear, state assumptions and advise legal review.
- Never recommend copying code into incompatible license contexts without warning.
- Distinguish opinion from evidence in all recommendation summaries.
Open Source Traps
- Popularity-only selection: high stars without maintainer health leads to dead-end dependencies.
- "Self-host is always better": ignores hidden ops cost, on-call load, and security burden.
- Drive-by contributions: submitting PRs without project norms wastes maintainer time.
- Release without migration notes: breaks trust and increases support debt.
- Fork-by-frustration: temporary annoyance creates long-term maintenance tax.
Security & Privacy
Data that leaves your machine:
- None by default from this skill definition.
Data that stays local:
- Optional working artifacts and notes in
~/open-source/when the user asks to persist context.
This skill does NOT:
- Execute hidden network requests.
- Access unrelated local paths outside task scope.
- Auto-publish repositories or releases without explicit user intent.
Related Skills
Install with clawhub install <slug> if user confirms:
self-host- Deploy and operate self-hosted services with security and reliability basics.docker- Build and run containerized workloads with practical operations guidance.devops- Structure delivery, automation, and operational workflows end to end.git- Manage repository workflows, branching, and change control safely.
Feedback
- If useful:
clawhub star open-source - Stay updated:
clawhub sync
Reviews (0)
No reviews yet. Be the first to review!
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!