Openclaw Rd Pipeline
Orchestrate OpenClaw end-to-end R&D delivery in Feishu from requirement intake to closure using PM, developer, reviewer, and tester subagents. Use when handl...
Description
name: openclaw-rd-pipeline description: Orchestrate OpenClaw end-to-end R&D delivery in Feishu from requirement intake to closure using PM, developer, reviewer, and tester subagents. Use when handling研发任务 that need structured requirement parsing, project-context enrichment from Feishu history/wiki, coding + PR flow, read-only review/testing gates, bug-loop rework, and final owner notification.
OpenClaw R&D Pipeline
Execute a deterministic workflow for Feishu-driven R&D tasks with strict role boundaries, status transitions, and closure rules.
Required Inputs
Collect or confirm these fields before starting:
- Feishu source context: group/chat ID, message URL, requirement text, requester
- Requirement metadata: priority, project tag, deadline
- Project configuration: repository URL, production branch, owner/team role mapping
- Task identifiers: requirement ID and Feishu task/doc IDs once created
If priority is missing, set it to medium.
Role Boundaries
Apply these permissions strictly:
- Main agent: clone/update repository in read-only mode for context and handoff
- PM subagent: parse requirement, optimize prompt, coordinate confirmation, create Feishu task structure
- Developer subagent: create feature branch, implement code, push branch, open PR
- Reviewer subagent: read-only review, no code edits, no merge
- Tester subagent: read-only testing and CI verification, no code edits, no merge
Use an isolated git worktree and dedicated tmux session per subagent.
Workflow
1) Intake and Context Build
Extract baseline fields from Feishu requirement.
Load project config and produce a shared project_context with:
- project name
- repository URL
- production branch
- owner/team mapping
- requirement metadata
Then deepen understanding through PM subagent:
- Query historical tasks in same Feishu group by project tag and requirement type.
- Load project Feishu wiki docs: product docs, API docs, prior decomposition cases, coding/UI/API/testing norms.
- Reuse prior parsing logic, edge cases, and acceptance criteria.
2) PM Structured Parsing Output
Generate:
structured_requirement: business goal, inputs/outputs, boundaries, dependency modules/APIs, non-functional requirementsrefined_prompt: task prompt with historical references and explicit acceptance checks
For multi-module or multi-scenario tasks, call Superpowers skill for decomposition and acceptance criteria alignment. If unavailable, perform equivalent manual decomposition and mark it explicitly.
3) Prompt Confirmation and Task Creation
Send refined prompt to the responsible owner for confirmation.
If owner requests updates:
- propose changes with evidence from historical tasks and Feishu wiki
- iterate until approval
After approval:
- create Feishu master task/doc with status
待开始 - create 3 first-level subtasks with status
待开始: 编码, 评审, 测试 - attach relevant wiki norms in each subtask description
4) Development Stage
Set 编码 subtask to 进行中, then execute:
- branch from production branch
- implement per project coding standards and historical patterns
- commit and push feature branch
- open PR to production branch
- include requirement ID, Feishu task ID, and knowledge-base links in PR title/description
Set 编码 subtask to 已完成 after PR is ready.
5) Review Stage
Set 评审 subtask to 进行中, then perform read-only review for:
- logic correctness and edge cases
- exception handling
- security risks (injection, privilege issues, sensitive data)
- extensibility, reuse, performance
- UI/interaction conformance when frontend changes exist
- naming, structure, readability
Write findings in PR comments and cite historical review cases or wiki norms when relevant.
If pass, set 评审 subtask to 已完成.
If fail, reject with actionable reasons linked to historical issue patterns.
6) Test Stage
Set 测试 subtask to 进行中, then run:
- lint
- TypeScript type check
- unit tests
- Playwright E2E tests
Apply hard gate:
- if PR includes UI changes, require screenshot or recording in PR description
- if absent, fail CI and block merge
If pass, set 测试 subtask to 已完成.
If fail, log defects using defect taxonomy norms.
7) Failure Loop and Bug Subtasks
When review or test fails:
- create BUG subtask under master task with status
待开始 - include defect description, related norm, and similar historical bug case
- route back to developer subagent for fix and status progression
待开始 -> 进行中 -> 已完成 - rerun review/test stages after fix
If repeated failures occur, re-open PM parsing to verify requirement interpretation.
8) Closure and Notification
Allow closure only when all are true:
- 编码 subtask completed
- 评审 subtask completed
- 测试 subtask completed
- all BUG subtasks completed
Then:
- set master task status to
已完成 - notify owner in Feishu with summary package
Include in summary package:
- Feishu task card
- PM brief: parsing process, historical tasks/docs referenced
- Developer brief: branch, PR link, code delta
- Reviewer brief: decision, issue count, cited norms
- Tester brief: CI outcome, coverage/case count
- total cycle time
- optional comparison with similar historical tasks
Output Templates
Load references/templates.md and use those templates for:
- project context object
- refined prompt object
- PR description block
- review checklist
- test report
- final owner notification
Load references/feishu-fields.md to map real Feishu fields into pipeline fields.
Status Validation Script
Use scripts/validate_status_flow.py before state updates and before final closure.
Transition check:
scripts/validate_status_flow.py transition \
--task-type subtask \
--from-status 待开始 \
--to-status 进行中
Snapshot check:
scripts/validate_status_flow.py snapshot --file status_snapshot.json
status_snapshot.json must include:
mastercodingreviewtestingbug_subtasks(list)ui_changed(bool)ui_evidence_present(bool)
Reviews (0)
No reviews yet. Be the first to review!
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!