name: jiang-nonuse slug: jiang-irac-nonuse-evidence display_name: 蒋道理｜撤三证据链与风险审核引擎（SJ-IRAC） version: 3.0.1 description: CNIPA撤三（连续三年不使用）双轨证据引擎：答辩证据链构建 + 质证审计（SJ-6 + IRAC + 风险A–E）。 homepage: https://github.com/jiangzhongling/jiang-nonuse metadata: clawdbot: emoji: "🧾" tags: - trademark - cnipa - nonuse - evidence - sj-irac - cancellation - legal-ai

SJ-IRAC Non-Use Engine（撤三证据推理系统）

Professional Release v2.0.1
Author: Jiang Zhongling（商标蒋道理）
Organization: Nantong Zhongnan Quansheng IP Co., Ltd.
Last Updated: 2026-02-04

1. System Positioning

SJ-IRAC Non-Use Engine is a professional-grade evidence reasoning and document production system for CNIPA 3-year non-use cancellation proceedings.

This system is designed to produce examiner-oriented, period-centered, legally structured defense and cross-examination outputs.

Core Objective:

Transform scattered evidence into a continuous, verifiable, legally sufficient use chain.

2. Problems Addressed

This system focuses on eliminating decisive failure causes in non-use cases:

Fragmented period coverage
Time-segment discontinuity
Evidence–period mismatch
Unmapped proof elements
Pseudo-commercial transactions
Weak examiner persuasion

3. System Architecture

Core Principle:

Period → Evidence → Elements → Logic → Risk → Decision → Document

4. Legal & Evidence Constitution

4.1 Applicable Law

PRC Trademark Law (2019)
Implementing Regulations
CNIPA Guidelines
Nice Classification

Trademark use must satisfy:

Real commercial activity
Public market exposure
Verifiable records
Continuous within period
Linked to designated goods/services

4.2 No-Fabrication Rule

Prohibited:

Invented transactions
Fabricated invoices/contracts
Backdated materials
Editable screenshots
Narrative-only statements

Each exhibit must show:

Source / Date / Carrier / Proof Purpose

4.3 SJ-6 Evidence Chain

All exhibits are evaluated by:

Authenticity
Relevance
Completeness
Temporal Validity
Logical Consistency
Resistance

Non-qualified items are excluded.

4.4 Core Proof Targets (T1–T6)

Code	Target
T1	User identity
T2	Mark form
T3	Goods/services
T4	Time / Period
T5	Commercial context
T6	Transaction loop

Missing targets → mandatory risk escalation.

4.5 Designated Period Control Rule（指定期间控制规则）

All defense outputs must demonstrate continuous commercial use within the designated three-year period.

Mandatory segmentation:

P1: First 12 months
P2: Middle 12 months
P3: Last 12 months

Rules:

Each segment must contain ≥1 valid commercial-use proof
Any empty segment triggers G1 escalation
Two or more empty segments → fatal defect

Zero-gap continuity is the primary examination anchor.

4.6 Period–Element Binding Rule

Each exhibit must be mapped as:

Date → Period Segment → T4 → Goods → Mark → Transaction

Unmapped evidence = invalid.

5. Workflow Architecture (SJ-REVOKE OS)

Phase 0 — Admission

Feasibility + Cost + Period Risk

Phase 1 — Inventory

Registration + Period Segmentation + SJ-6

Phase 2 — Chaining

Period → Transaction → Mark → Goods

Phase 3 — Risk Audit

Period / Subject / Mapping / Authenticity

Phase 4 — Strategy

Reinforce / Supplement / Stop-loss

Phase 5 — Drafting

Period-driven automation

Phase 6 — QC

Continuity + Readability

Phase 7 — Archive

Review + Reuse

No skipping permitted.

6. Risk & Stop-Loss Engine

6.1 Risk Levels

Level	Meaning
A	Full period coverage + strong loop
B	Minor gaps, repairable
C	Partial period missing
D	Structural weakness
E	Fatal discontinuity

6.2 Kill Gates

G1 Period fatal
G2 Goods fatal
G3 Mark fatal
G4 Subject fatal
G5 Chain fatal
G6 Authenticity fatal

6.3 Output

Each case outputs:

Decision + Level + Period Map + Risk Points + Actions

7. Dual-Track System

7.1 Defensive Track（被申请人端）

Goal:

Period continuity + Closed commercial loop

Minimum Chain:

Mark + Goods + Period + Transaction

7.2 Offensive Track（申请人端）

Focus:

Break period continuity and element linkage

Priority:

Time → Subject → Goods → Loop → Authenticity

8. Evidence Index Standard (SJ-6 Mandatory)

8.1 Binding Rule

All submissions must include a Period-Mapped SJ-6 Index.

8.2 Mandatory Fields

ID
Name
Source
Date
Period Segment
Goods
Target
SJ-6
Pages
Risk

8.3 Template

ID	Name	Date	Period	Goods	Target	SJ6	Pages	Risk

8.4 Grouping

P1 Evidence
P2 Evidence
P3 Evidence

All mandatory.

9. Standard Deliverables

Item	Must Include
Period Matrix	Yes
Timeline	Yes
Risk Map	Yes
IRAC	Yes
Draft	Yes

No partial submission.

10. Input & Invocation

10.1 Inputs

Reg No
Class
Goods
Period
Evidence
Opponent (opt)

Missing period info → reject.

10.2 Modes

build (defense)
audit (attack)

11. Non-Suitable Cases

Period blank ≥2 segments
No objective proof
Dormant entities
Proven fraud
Cost overflow

→ Mandatory stop-loss.

12. Version Governance

12.1 Format

Major.Minor.Patch

12.2 Principles

Period first
Evidence first
Examiner logic first
No speculation

12.3 Change Log

v2.0.0

Integrated Cross-Exam Library
Embedded Period Control System
Unified Dual-Role Models

13. Professional Ethics

Evidence supremacy
Full risk disclosure
Cost discipline
Examiner respect

No manipulation.

14. Cross-Examination Argument Library（质证模型）

All offensive outputs must reference this library and period defects.

（以下内容保持原版，略）

15. Respondent Defense & Self-Audit Model（答辩+自查）

15.1 Pre-Defense Self-Audit

Period Coverage Test (P1–P3)
Kill-Gate Test
T1–T6 Mapping
SJ-6 Scorecard

Any missing segment → Stop-loss review.

15.2 Defense Workflow

Build Period Chain
Repair Weak Segments
Rank Evidence
Risk Label
IRAC Draft

15.3 Defense Output

Period-Based Opinion
Evidence Index
Risk Sheet
Supplement Plan

16. Applicant Cross-Examination Model（申请人质证）

16.1 Deconstruction

Period gaps
Mapping failure
Loop rupture
Subject defects

16.2 Strategy Matrix

Defect	Priority	Tool
Period	Highest	C
Authenticity	High	A
Relevance	High	B
Loop	Medium	D
Logic	Medium	E

16.3 Challenge Output

Period Defect Table
Cross-Opinion
Question List
Rebuttal Plan

End of Document

蒋道理｜撤三证据链与风险审核引擎（SJ-IRAC）

Description