🧪 Skills

Solana Trade

End-to-end Solana development playbook (Jan 2026). Prefer Solana Foundation framework-kit (@solana/client + @solana/react-hooks) for React/Next.js UI. Prefer...

v1.0.0
❤️ 0
⬇️ 138
👁 1
Share

Description


name: solana-dev description: End-to-end Solana development playbook (Jan 2026). Prefer Solana Foundation framework-kit (@solana/client + @solana/react-hooks) for React/Next.js UI. Prefer @solana/kit for all new client/RPC/transaction code. When legacy dependencies require web3.js, isolate it behind @solana/web3-compat (or @solana/web3.js as a true legacy fallback). Covers wallet-standard-first connection (incl. ConnectorKit), Anchor/Pinocchio programs, Codama-based client generation, LiteSVM/Mollusk/Surfpool testing, and security checklists. user-invocable: true

Solana Development Skill (framework-kit-first)

What this Skill is for

Use this Skill when the user asks for:

  • Solana dApp UI work (React / Next.js)
  • Wallet connection + signing flows
  • Transaction building / sending / confirmation UX
  • On-chain program development (Anchor or Pinocchio)
  • Client SDK generation (typed program clients)
  • Local testing (LiteSVM, Mollusk, Surfpool)
  • Security hardening and audit-style reviews

Default stack decisions (opinionated)

  1. UI: framework-kit first
  • Use @solana/client + @solana/react-hooks.
  • Prefer Wallet Standard discovery/connect via the framework-kit client.
  1. SDK: @solana/kit first
  • Prefer Kit types (Address, Signer, transaction message APIs, codecs).
  • Prefer @solana-program/* instruction builders over hand-rolled instruction data.
  1. Legacy compatibility: web3.js only at boundaries
  • If you must integrate a library that expects web3.js objects (PublicKey, Transaction, Connection), use @solana/web3-compat as the boundary adapter.
  • Do not let web3.js types leak across the entire app; contain them to adapter modules.
  1. Programs
  • Default: Anchor (fast iteration, IDL generation, mature tooling).
  • Performance/footprint: Pinocchio when you need CU optimization, minimal binary size, zero dependencies, or fine-grained control over parsing/allocations.
  1. Testing
  • Default: LiteSVM or Mollusk for unit tests (fast feedback, runs in-process).
  • Use Surfpool for integration tests against realistic cluster state (mainnet/devnet) locally.
  • Use solana-test-validator only when you need specific RPC behaviors not emulated by LiteSVM.

Operating procedure (how to execute tasks)

When solving a Solana task:

1. Classify the task layer

  • UI/wallet/hook layer
  • Client SDK/scripts layer
  • Program layer (+ IDL)
  • Testing/CI layer
  • Infra (RPC/indexing/monitoring)

2. Pick the right building blocks

  • UI: framework-kit patterns.
  • Scripts/backends: @solana/kit directly.
  • Legacy library present: introduce a web3-compat adapter boundary.
  • High-performance programs: Pinocchio over Anchor.

3. Implement with Solana-specific correctness

Always be explicit about:

  • cluster + RPC endpoints + websocket endpoints
  • fee payer + recent blockhash
  • compute budget + prioritization (where relevant)
  • expected account owners + signers + writability
  • token program variant (SPL Token vs Token-2022) and any extensions

4. Add tests

  • Unit test: LiteSVM or Mollusk.
  • Integration test: Surfpool.
  • For "wallet UX", add mocked hook/provider tests where appropriate.

5. Deliverables expectations

When you implement changes, provide:

  • exact files changed + diffs (or patch-style output)
  • commands to install/build/test
  • a short "risk notes" section for anything touching signing/fees/CPIs/token transfers

Progressive disclosure (read when needed)

Reviews (0)

Sign in to write a review.

No reviews yet. Be the first to review!

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!

Compatible Platforms

Pricing

Free

Related Configs