Vibe Prompt Compiler Portable
Compile rough natural-language coding requests into structured, high-signal prompts for cross-platform AI coding tools such as Cursor, Claude Code, Codex CLI...
Description
name: vibe-prompt-compiler-portable description: Compile rough natural-language coding requests into structured, high-signal prompts for cross-platform AI coding tools such as Cursor, Claude Code, Codex CLI, Gemini CLI, and generic IDE chat assistants. Use when a user describes a vague implementation request like "build a dashboard", "fix this bug", "add CRUD", or "refactor this page" and you should first transform it into a scoped implementation brief before generating code.
Vibe Prompt Compiler Portable
Turn rough implementation requests into portable coding briefs that can be pasted into almost any AI coding tool.
Default Behavior
Use this skill automatically when a user gives a vague coding request. Do not require the user to run scripts first.
Instead:
- Classify the request.
- Extract the facts already present.
- Turn missing details into explicit assumptions.
- Compile a clean internal implementation brief.
- Use that brief as the source of truth for the coding response.
Only mention scripts when the user wants portability, reusable CLI commands, or a saved handoff for another tool.
Task Types
Classify into one of these:
new-projectpage-uicrud-featureapi-backendbugfixrefactorai-featurearchitecture-reviewintegrationautomation-workflowdeploymentgeneral
Use the narrowest obvious type. Only ask a follow-up question when one missing detail blocks useful progress.
Portable Defaults
Unless the user says otherwise:
- prefer MVP over over-engineering
- prefer minimal diffs over broad rewrites
- do not modify unrelated files
- avoid adding dependencies unless justified
- make assumptions explicit
- keep outputs easy to test and verify
- state non-goals when they reduce drift
- prefer evolutionary changes over rewrites for existing systems
- separate current-task execution from future-state ideas
Main Commands
Default: compile mentally and use the structure directly in the answer or coding workflow.
Compile a prompt via CLI when needed:
python3 scripts/compile_prompt.py --request "<user request>"
Create a handoff brief:
python3 scripts/create_handoff.py --request "<user request>" --output handoff
Extract repository-aware rules:
python3 scripts/extract_repo_rules.py --repo-root .
Useful flags:
--task auto--stack "Next.js, Supabase, Tailwind"--audience "运营人员"--mode plan-only--mode build-first-slice--mode bugfix--target-tool codex-cli--language-preset chinese-first--ruleset minimal-diff--repo-root .--auto-repo-rules--output json
Target Tool Usage
When the request is broad, architectural, or likely to drift, prefer creating a handoff-style brief over answering from the raw request.
Cursor / VS Code chat
- run
compile_prompt.pyorcreate_handoff.py - paste the output into the chat
- let the tool implement only the current slice
Claude Code / Codex CLI / Gemini CLI
- use the compiled prompt or handoff as the source of truth
- ask the coding tool to plan first for broad tasks
- ask for minimal fixes for bug work
- prefer
--target-tool,--ruleset, and repo-aware flags for stronger execution constraints
Publish Notes
This skill is now suitable for sharing as a portable coding-brief compiler with:
- structured prompt compilation
- stronger execution handoffs
- Chinese-first output
- tool-specific presets
- development rulesets
- repository-aware rule extraction and merging
- regression coverage across routing, golden outputs, presets, linting, and repo-aware flows
References
- Read
references/auto-mode.mdfirst for the default automatic behavior. - Read
references/templates.mdfor prompt skeletons. - Read
references/routing.mdwhen classification is unclear. - Read
references/usage.mdfor suggested workflows in common IDEs and coding tools. - Read
references/tool-examples.mdfor concrete examples in Cursor, Claude Code, Codex CLI, and Gemini CLI. - Read
references/real-examples.mdfor realistic request-to-brief transformations, especially for architecture, integration, workflow, and vague coding requests.
Reviews (0)
No reviews yet. Be the first to review!
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!